Monday, October 6, 2014

On "Gone Girl"


The protagonists in Gone Girl are lovely to look at, but they do ugly things to each other and to the people around them. Their first encounter is charming; the kiss it culminates in is one of the prettiest things I've seen at the movies this year. Powdered sugar swirls in the air, dusting Rosamund Pike's movie star face (a face that like her performance is much more uncompromisingly chilly than one might have expected for Amazing Amy, but perhaps much more interesting for that unexpected touch of ice), and Trent Reznor's gleaming, potent score is full of twilit magic. The proposal of marriage is also charming; Ben Affleck's Nick gallantly saves Amy from embarrassing media questions with cute compliments and a ring. But the marriage itself is neither charming nor charmed for long. It becomes an unhappy, unfortunate thing when the marital set these two perform on changes to a space that is less prettily designed, harder to "block." There's this moment (maybe made up) when Amy asks Nick why he's forcing her to be that wife – the nag, the harridan. That's not the role she wants to play. She'd rather be the cool wife, the good wife, and he is to be the good husband. But it isn't easy to be good or cool when there is no more money and no more big city glamor. It is easier to lie and to cheat and to hate each other. Nick doesn't make Amy feel light like he used to; he drains her of her patience and her resources. Amy doesn't make Nick better or smarter anymore; she makes him feel cornered and diminished. The relationship goes from symbiotic to vampiric. People stalk and beat and kill in Gone Girl; gore is splattered in sick, abstract-expressionist tableaux. But what makes this movie scary is the notion that love warps so easily into something monstrous and keening for blood. We claim to know, really know our life partners, our spouses, but can we really know another person? Can we know what will make the switch flick and the light go out in the beautiful, beloved heads of the people we hold closest to ourselves. Fincher suggests that the most frightening monsters might not be under the bed but in it, right next to us.

Gone Girl sets its mystery, with the sort of mounting pressure that makes you feel like you're arrested in the final moments of an unpleasant dream, struggling to wake up but also curious to see how it all turns out, against an inquiry into the workings of a marriage. That relationship, much like the town that Amy goes missing in, is portrayed here as a thing of sunny surfaces and a cankered underbelly. New Carthage is photogenic suburbia peopled with sunny Midwesterners in some scenes, and seedy ruins full of broke, broken shadow-folk in others. In marriage too, there are the stories one tells Рof annual wedding anniversary treasure hunts, for instance, or of little signals to signify trust or love that only one's significant other can recognize, and then then there are the resentments that charge these benign-seeming totems of the relationship and turn presents into weapons and shared vulnerabilities into exploitable weaknesses. Gone Girl is interested in the falsehoods intrinsic to romantic relationships that couples hide out of sight underneath the signifiers of a fairy-tale romance. The film asks us to consider that the marriage narrative is one that inevitably loses steam as time goes on, has its powdered-sugar enchantment rubbed off it by the banal realities of strained finances, say, or unmet expectations. Perhaps the way to avoid the commonplace ending Рthe prolonged low-key misery of long-term unhappiness or the charmless grotesquerie of divorce Рis to borrow tropes from outside the genre, so to speak, of the love story. Both Amy and Nick are writers, after all. While Nick, often the less sharp mind in the relationship, writes in clich̩s outside the margins of his marriage, Amy much more inventively borrows from the whodunit, (She even does homework for her plan with books on murder.) Just as she plotted games in which her husband looked for clues that led him to a present, she plots a jape in which he might end up in jail for her murder. Fun!

Fincher plays at length with the idea of marriage as a fundamentally performative construct, a story to be written and read and acted out, a spectator sport. The neighbors, the friends, the parents, even the media in a certain kind of relationship are watching open-mouthed and hungry for the next twist as they would a film, a television show, or a play – and then passing judgment as they would on said film, television show, or play. Gone Girl's twisted sense of humor comes from its investigation of real life as reality-TV-esque spectacle. The entire nation is perversely gripped by the Nick and Amy's strange situation. They want more. In a deliciously ironic scene, Nick sees that his once-failing bar is the town hot-spotnow that its owner might be a murderer. A woman, styled like someone out of the Real Housewives franchise and volunteering at Amy's search headquarters, wants to take a smiling selfie with Nick and later sends it to a smarmy, outraged newsperson. Tanner Bolt (played with glorious, amused understatement by Tyler Perry) tells Nick: "You two are the most fucked up people I know, and I specialize in fucked up people." He is laughing; he is entertained by their spectacle. And he is not alone. Everyone wants to watch, hear about, and be part of Nick and Amy's freak show.

But the outsiders are not the only spectators here. Nick and Amy watch each other, and watch themselves watch each other. At first, they act out better, cooler versions of themselves to reel the other in, and then, when Nick loses interest, Amy decides it’s time to amp the drama up. And it works. Because Nick is paying attention not only to Amy’s machinations, but to his own responses. He preens after getting a TV interview right, for instance. He’s made an impression. He’s got through to her. Even after she comes back, and he finds himself stuck in the mousetrap of his marriage, he is at least a little into it. Because there are ways out of that mousetrap, if he really wanted to make a run for it. The audience knows it, his endlessly supportive sister Margo (Carrie Coon, a dry, authentic standout in a terrific supporting cast) knows it, and he knows it. But Nick, with his folders full of ideas for novels he's never written, is now living in an interesting story, is finally an interesting character. Amy, too, returns to him, risking exposure, because she finally feels seen. For Amy, to be seen as she is - devious, destructive, exacting, uncompromising - is to be loved. If Nick knows her, he loves her, must love her, will love her.

While Gone Girl manages to hint at all these engaging ideas within the framework of a relentlessly entertaining thriller, While Gone Girl manages to hint at all these gripping ideas within the framework of a relentlessly entertaining thriller, I think its critique of marriage could have been more nuanced if the narratorial scales had been more balanced. Both Nick and Amy are fucked up people who do fucked up things. Nut since the narrative is mainly focalized through Nick for the first half of the film, and he is being hounded and grilled (though we don’t know yet for certain if he deserves to be or not), we react with cautious sympathy to him, handsome and likable, albeit, as we learn, pretty flawed. Amy, on the other hand, emerges initially from her journal entries. She is perfect and love at first in these entries, and then perfect and scared. But we are meant to think that she might already be dead when we hear from her via the journal. So her voice is not as real to us, her troubles not as immediate and pressing as Nick's. (Though her diary indicates that he was physically violent with her, that he was a profligate spender, that he didn't want her to get pregnant, his bafflement at these charges reads as pretty genuine to us.) By the time we learn that she isn't dead, and we finally get her "true" perspective, she is revealed to be a diabolical villainess, hell-bent on destroying her husband's life for a crime he didn't commit. And she's destroyed a former paramour's life. And she'll go on to kill another lover. While her husband's misdeeds – the cheating, the neglectfulness – are crappy, they are also human. Amy does evil things because she wants revenge. We never truly get to see the character as a fully realized person as opposed to a figment of her own diabolical imagination or an almost-mythic beast of vengeance. She tells us that the initial years of her marriage truly were good, that Nick really did make her feel happy. We also get to see a brief glimpse of her as someone with emotions other than rage when she finds out that her husband is now enamored with a younger woman, even though she has given up her money, her life in New York, and a good deal of her emotional energy for him. Rosamund Pike brings a world of shading to that wordless, almost throwaway moment. But it is not enough. If the story is about a philandering doofus and the psychopath who brought him to heel, its reflections on the psychosis of marriage itself become less provocative. The film, then, functions as a very solid example of modern noir, but maybe not much more. And it becomes a more troubling piece of art, too, since Amy's legitimate complaints and concerns about men who don't try hard enough and expect too much, about women who have to keep trying with diminishing returns, become moot, since they're coming out of the mouth of the person who cried rape and murder. I worried that the film could be trivializing the issues of violence against women, that a certain kind of person, who unfortunately abounds in society, would take away from this film the moral that women do make this shit up all the time, or that they're crazies who asked for it.

But I think Fincher is actually interested in more than a crackling genre exercise or a blasé indictment of “psycho bitches.” Its interrogation of how people in relationships connect to and alienate each other, put on a show for and reveal themselves to each other feels neither incidental or accidental (and it helps that Affleck and Pike play their characters as more than just a hapless schmo and an ice-demon, respectively). The failure, then, is one of (too-faithful) adaptation, to borrow a phrase from this sharp piece. Sure, the idea of this force of implacable evil as a villain makes for compelling storytelling, but we see (in her scenes at the motel, at Desi’s house) that Amy has glimmers of more than that. What if Fincher and Flynn had gone mining for more of those glimmers instead of giving in to the temptation of creating a Big Bad? What if they’d disposed of that previous boyfriend and given Nick a different hook to claw his way into Amy’s psyche with? I wonder, but as it stands, Gone Girl still feels like something more than soapy, scary fun. I find myself wrestling with its pleasures and problems days after I watched it, and I suspect that while it doesn’t marry (ha!) its more interesting concerns entirely successfully with its pursuit of more pulpy pleasures, it still manages to poke around in some dark, troubling places in that attempt.


No comments:

Post a Comment